Party Wall Time

I was recently at a short course for some aspiring and some practising residential developers when the issue of party walls came up.  Many of the attendees were engaged in small-scale conversions or adding additional space in existing dwellings.  I asked them whether party wall disputes were a common issue.  The response was pretty definite – they were.  James Pickford has a good piece on them in the FT today focussing on the growing use of security deposits.

The problem is not the procedure for deciding on how a basement is to be built or safety issues, but the security deposit that neighbours are now increasingly demanding — and which the Act says they have a right to require — in case the build goes wrong. Although this is merely a deposit, which is held and returned at the end of the work, the sums being demanded are rising fast. Today, a five- or six-figure sum is not unusual, forcing the person doing the work either to find the cash upfront or dispute the amount (this also carries a cost in terms of delay and uncertainty). Advisers are convinced that in some cases, an eye-watering security deposit is being used by neighbours as a tactic to frustrate and delay work, raising costs for the owner.

Luckily, the wonderfully named Pyramus and Thisbe Group (think Institute for Party Wall Surveyors)  have produced brand new guidance.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s